Available from: Underworld Amusements | Amazon.com | Amazon.UK | Barnes & Noble | Bookshop.org

DER GEIST issue five features the first publication of original research, and archival materials thought lost. Steven T. Byington (first English translation of Der Einzige und sein Eigentum by Max Stirner); Thomas Common (first English translation of Friedrich Nietzsche); Georgia Replogle (first English-language journal on egoism); Malfew Seklew (the Laughing Philosopher); Arthur Desmond (author of a notorious book); Dora Marsden, S. E. Parker and more.

DER GEIST (Trevor Blake, editor; Kevin I. Slaughter, co-editor) is an English-language journal for an international audience, publishing original scholarship on the philosophy of egoism. The journal is descriptive of the first century of egoism in print (from the 1845 publication of Der Einzige und sein Eigentum by Max Stirner to the end of 1945), not prescriptive in advocacy of egoism.

DER GEIST, The Journal of Egoism from 1845 – 1945
ISSUE 5
Spring 2022
Paperback, 206 pages, fifteen dollars
ISBN 978-1944651244
ISSN 2639-5339

CONTENTS

Introduction by the Editor

1. Steven T. Byington

A Proofreader Looks Back | The Human Cutworm | Photo of Steven T. Byington | Biographical Note | Selected Bibliography

2. Thomas Common

Review of Survival of the Fittest | The Silent Isle: Finding the Gravesite of Thomas Common | A Memorial | Selected Bibliography

3. Ragnar Redbeard

Bertha McNamara’s Reflections on Arthur Desmond | Illustration from The Worker | John Ploughman and His Letter | The Brutalitarian: A Journal for the Sane and the Strong | Lion’s Paw Banned | Confessions of an Anarchist

4. Max Stirner / The Ego And His Own

Donald Rooum’s “Eigenheit” | An Early Literary Portrait of Max Stirner

5. Dora Marsden

Brainy Beauties | Private Places | Lover of Freedom

6. Malfew Seklew

Dan O’Brien, Social Supercrat | Victor Grayson, M.P.: A Rhapsody on a Reality | Spencella Wilkesbarre’s What Women Ought to Know | Stanley Simpoleon Says Seklew Stand-In | William Henry Powell and Malfew Seklew | Poetic Beer Drinker | A Remarkable Character | Two from Day Book

7. Free Spirits

Photo of Georgia Replogle | Photo of S. E. Parker | Letter from Denise Juin | Interview with S. E. Parker | Sophie Leppel’s “Pig Eaters Challenge” | Herbert Roseman on Laurance Labadie | Leedz Anarkyst: Greevz Fisher (1845-1931) | Holbrook Jackson on Nietzsche | Index of Der Geist | From the Library | Index to The Lumberjack / Voice of the People | A Thank-You to Patrons | Select Titles Available | About the Editors

Der Geist issue 4 is now available! That creates a total of 724 pages of egoism from 1845 to 1945, with “lost” works reprinted, new translations every issue, rare photos and images, and new research and writing.

Available from: Underworld Amusements | Amazon.com | Amazon.UK | Barnes & Noble | Bookshop.org

In this issue, a previously undiscovered speech by Ragnar Redbeard; original translations of Max Stirner and Malfew Seklew; rare reproductions from Dora Marsden and Friedrich Nietzsche; individualists and eccentrics versus the KKK; and more.

DER GEIST, The Journal of Egoism from 1845 – 1945
ISSUE 4
Spring 2021
Paperback, 172 pages, fifteen dollars
ISBN 978-1944651-21-3
ISSN 2639-5339

Reproduced below is one of the known Seklew pieces.

THE EGO
By MALFEW SEKLEW
as published in The Clarion | Vol. II – No. 2. (14) | February-March 1934

An Ego is an Individual, an entity with an identity. He may be either a cipher or a character; a nonentity or a personality; an unconscious Ego, or a Conscious Egoist.

What is this thing called Myself?

What is an Ego? It is the essence of energy, the quintessence of all the vitalities registering themselves in the sensorium; a rendezvous for all the realities of Life; a depot of desire; a storeroom of sensation and an emporium of Enlightened Egoism.

The Conscious Ego, the I is the eye of evolution looking down the corridors of consciousness into the future, at the same time, seeking new sensations which may lead to new wisdom.

Ego Consciousness is the rule of reason measuring the motives of man.

You are the most important Ego in the word to yourself. You are somebody; yourself is sacred; every thing you do is done the best way you know how.

Every Conscious Ego can say:
I am, I am myself, I am I.

I am conscious of my present state with ability to differentiate, and separate the past from the present, and with power to mould the future in some degree.

I am conscious of continuity of existence. I am capable of testing the pulse of personality, and of recording the added consciousness of the Ego.

Increase your consciousness and you will increase the circumferences of your happiness.

If you have any corrections, additions or have some archival material to donate, please use our contact form.
Underworld Amusements has published THE book on Malfew Seklew, with an introduction by Trevor Blake. Get it from Underworld Amusements or Amazon.com.

Reproduced below is one of the known Seklew pieces.

GEMS OF THOUGHT
By MALFEW SEKLEW
as published in The Clarion | Vol. I – No. 1. | September 1932

Everyone is the center of his own world.

 *  *  *  *

Things may hurt our bodies; men may blacken our reputations; mischance may sweep away our fortunes; but no one thing except ourselves can hurt ourselves.

The final difference which marks the man of character from the weakling is the difference in that inner life of which he alone is master. The person who is the slave of circumstances abdicates his rulership over his own life. He is a slave where he should be a master.

Within the range of our human prerogatives, the self is omnipotent. Nothing can hurt it save as it lets itself be hurt.

 *  *  *  *

The pleasures of pursuit are more alluring than the placid joys of safety. The line of most resistance is the line of most attraction because there is more danger. The strong man seeks danger because he acquires new sensations which produce new situations and add zest to life.

 *  *  *  *

The best test of the qualities of a civilization is the quality of its leisure.

 *  *  *  *

Emulation is the finest form of imitation and the highest kind of competition. Emulation is competition without greed, which often terminates in co-operation. Emulation, enhanced with enthusiasm and adorned with wisdom will produce supermanity which is the next stage in human evolution.

 *  *  *  *

Inspirations cost nothing because they are the woof and warp of thoughts placed in loom of memory. They are the embroideries of ecstasy, and the whispers of wisdom. Imagination unites oceans, and the children of the Imagination transform mountains, conquer the mighty forces of nature like Niagara Falls, and compel the waste places of the earth to fructify and flourish for the benefit of humanity.

 *  *  *  *

Woman has not yet come to her own. When she finds herself out from within—she will control things from without, for it is by woman that Nature writes on the hearts of men. All great men have had great mothers—for mothers are the matrix of mortality—when women understand the psychic laws that govern life before birth, then will great mothers abound, and great men be plentiful. Then the genius will be as plentiful as the grocer, for woman is the designer of the destiny of man, the monarchese of morality; the chemist of consciousness; the alchemist of posterity ; and the creator of a new humanity.

If you have any corrections, additions or have some archival material to donate, please use our contact form.
Underworld Amusements has published THE book on Malfew Seklew, with an introduction by Trevor Blake. Get it from Underworld Amusements or Amazon.com.

If you’d paid attention to the site you’ll have noticed a great deal of material has been pulled from the Libertarian Microfiche Project that was run by John Zube from 1978 to around 2012. Over the course of time Mr. Zube committed about 500,000 pages of libertarian, anarchist, free market and other related material to microfiche in a series he called Peace Plans.

Between my co-founder Trevor Blake, our good friend Dustin and myself we are ready to match donations dollar for dollar to go toward purchasing an entire set of microfiche and archival sleeves and archival storage boxes.

We need a total of  $2,000 to purchase the fiche and the archival supplies to properly store them. Beginning in August of 2016, all money donated to the UoE project will go just to the Libertarian Microfiche Publishing Peace Plans acquisition until it and the archival materials are all together in the Union of Egoists archive.

I have registered http://www.libertarianmicrofiche.com and resurrected the index to the Peace Plans from the grave of archive.org. To get an idea of the magnitude and importance of his work and the archive, spend a few minutes browsing the site.

From “The Phoenix Nest,” a column by William Rose Benet appearing in the April 26 1947 edition of The Saturday Review (page 36)…

Mark Twain relates in one of his stories, the furore up in Heaven when an obscure tailor, Billings by name, from somewhere in Tennessee, arrives in the Celestial realm. Shakespeare is proud to sit at his feet while at the banquet in his honor; it is Homer who stands behind his chair and waits upon him. Yet this was an unknown poet although recognized by his peers as the greatest of them all. No mortal had ever read his verses. They had never even been published. In fact, during his lifetime he had been merely the butt of his contemporaries.

There were many such back in the twenties. For every Eugene O’Neil, Floyd Dell, Ben Hecht, or Maxwell Bodenheim, there were a dozen other real personalities in Greenwich Village and Union Square whose names have rarely reached the public except in column-long eulogies at their passing.

Looking back at those days a score or more years ago, one is struck by the renaissance of thinking which followed the First World War. There was a complete examination and overhauling of ideas which is sadly lacking today. It was a time of great optimism, for everyone felt that if the problems of the world had not as yet all been solved, at least their solution was attainable if not already in sight.

Thoughts were precious then and intellectual integrity the highest goal. There was no compromise with the popular taste in these philosophers, writers, and artists whose books were never printed and pictures never bought. Yet they were men and women of character. In an earlier age they might have been looked on as saints. They were in this world but not of this world. Their wants were few, a cold water flat on the East Side, where they could paint or write or dream, a meagre meal every once in a while was all they required. Yet this was often beyond their reach.

As chairman of the old Dill Pickle Club on 14th Street where they were wont to congregate, the writer knew them well and mourns their passing. There are but few of them left. Ike Shepps still holds forth at Columbus Circle with his satirical tirades against the futile money-grubbing pursuits of humanity. Jo Silverman, who studied medicine in England and then never practised [sic] it because he felt that too little was known about the art, today in his eighty-third year still pursues his studies of Spinoza and the humanities in his hovel on East 3rd Street. Dan O’Brien, King of the Hoboes, no longer delights his listeners with his wit and rich Irish brogue. He merely awaits his end in one of the city’s charitable institutes. Joe Gould still works on his “History” of our times. But where are the Wilkesbarrs, Pollocks, Marchands, Jack Joneses, and Lizzy Davises all gone like the snows of yesteryear?

The “Sirfessor,” as Wilkesbarr was called, rated a column-and-a-half obituary in The New York Times. Is there today in existence a single copy of his “Gospel According to Malfew Seklew,” to which he devoted his entire life? His was the doctrine of enlightened selfishness. He sought the rise of a race of “Supcrcrats,” an aristocracy of brains and skill that would rescue the world from its rising slough of mediocrity. His was a voice “crying in the wilderness.” A Cockney by birth, he had sung with the D’Oyly Carte Company. He had known Shaw and Wells and the Webbs intimately, yet never was his work known by more than a few dozens of his friends.

Abe Pollock was a collar salesman until in middle life, like Gauguin, he began to paint. His work was praised by some critics, scoffed at by others but it never sold. Perhaps Michelangelo passes him the finger bowls in Heaven.

Dr. Marchand had been a professor at Columbia University. During the anti-German outbreak of World War I, he was fired from his job. He never recovered from the blow. He spent his life on the personal project of coordinating all human knowledge. His manuscripts? Who knows where they are today!

There was Helen Langdon, who knew more about Oriental art than some curators of museums. She died in a garret (it was whispered of starvation), yet she could never bring herself to part with her precious Cinnabar vases and Japanese sword-guards.

Those were the days when ideas were all important, when Pollock and Vincent Beltrone holding opposite views on the subject of art — almost but not quite coming to blows about their theories — could argue far into the night before a group of enthralled listeners.

When Leon Samson first read his manuscript on the “New Humanism,” the entire intellectual body of the town was split into “pro” and “anti” factions.

Yes, ideas were important then and poetry was important. John Cabbage with his “Sea Chanteys,” Jack Sellers, Anton Romatka, Lew Ney each had his defenders and detractors, but they were sincere and judged them by their poetry and not as today by their political orientation.

It is amusing to note how many of the former dwellers within their “ivory towers” today have hung “to let” signs upon them and have rushed into the arms of the “proletariat.” For them perhaps, thinking is no longer necessary. Still the prospect of a world without the Sirfessor and his kind is anything but pleasant.

Where are the youngsters who are to take their places? Who will dare to question the dogmatism of the right or the left? Who will examine every self-ordained savior and demagogue and puncture stuffed shirts with an ever-ready arsenal of barbed wit?

Will they perhaps be found among the student bodies of our universities or will their war training and their exposure to college curricula squeeze out the last drops of individualism that they may have retained? What can we expect of a generation reared on comic strips and movies? Perhaps a revulsion, perhaps a re-awakening of a burning love for Democracy which is the only cradle for Nature’s masterpiece — the individual Ego.

The Union of Egoists is in hot pursuit of details regarding Sirfessor Wilkebarre’s time in the D’oyly theater company. Working for D’oyly would explain why the one and only Malfew Seklew repeatedly cites Gilbert and Sullivan in Gospel According to Malfew Seklew.

His own biographical sketch from Svein Olav Nyberg’s Non Serviam (1992), issue #13 is as follows:

 Sidney E. Parker: “Born 1929, Birmingham, England. Now retired after thirty three years with British Rail. Has worked his way through the Young Communist League (1944-1946), the British Federation of Young Co-operators (1946-1947), and virtually all the different varieties of anarchism (1947-1982), to emerge as his own man, the penny of conscious egoism having finally dropped. Editor and publisher of Minus One/Ego/The Egoist/Ego 1963-1994.”

If you are interested in reading some of Sidney Parker’s writing, we recommend “Enemies of Society: An Anthology of Individualist and Egoist Thought” by Ardent Press. It is usually available from Underworld Amusements (US).

The UoE podcast will be posted sporadically as episodes are produced, and we expect them to consist of both archival and newly recorded material. If you know of any archival Egoist related audio material, or have any other suggestions or comments, please contact us.

The song you hear through the episode and in full at the end is “Depth of my Ego” by Matt McGinn, “one of Scotland’s greatest song writers”. “Depth of My Ego” was “inspired by the ideas of Max Stirner as introduced to Matt by ‘Bobby’ Lynn.” It is also on YouTube.

The following was pulled up using the Internet Archive and is not easily accessible. For ease of reference, we’re pasting it below, currently unedited…

MINUS ONE + EGOIST + EGO

ed. by Sidney E. Parker, London 1963-1993

TABLES OF CONTENTS

Compiled by Bernd A. Laska, Nürnberg, Germany. Still incomplete – any reader is invited to fill in the gaps and/or send the (scanned or typed) texts of the articles to THE EGOIST ARCHIVE.

• Nr.1, Sept. 1963, 8p
  • >>> MINUS ONE<<<
  >>> AN INDIVIDUALIST ANARCHIST REVIEW<<<
• [Fear of Freedom – Erich Fromm]
• “Sisyphus”, a Calvin-Schopenhauer-Heidegger pessimist on “Freedom”
• Armand, The Joy of Living (trans. from French)
• Nrs.2 to 5 >>>missing>>>
• Nr.6, Jan-Feb 1965, 11p (unpag.)
  • DeCasseres, The Call of Dionysos
  • Jean-Pierre Laly, To Express Oneself
  • A.J. Baker, The Illusions of Moralism
  • J.R., Some Reflections
  • Domenico Pastorello, Blackmail
  • Correspondence
  • Alastair MacHenry, On the Track of Scholar Gipsy
• Nrs.7 to 12 gt;>>missing>>>
• Nr.13, March-April 1966, 22p
  • S.E. Parker, A Brace of Moralists
  • Laurance Labadie, On Competition
  • Pat Parker, Beauty
  • Kerry Thornley, Letter from America: Left, Right, and Centre
  • E. Bertran, The Bonnot Gang, A Reminiscence
  • Domenico Pastorello, The Rehabilitation of Judas
  • J-P.S. [Jean-Pierre Schweitzer], Prolegomena to an Anarchist Philosophy
  • 3 – Politics
  • Letters: Francis Ellingham, Arthur J. Uloth, Michael Woolliscroft
  • Lyman Tower Sargent, Right Wing Individualism in the United States – 2 (Cont.)
  • Jeff Robinson, Will Somebody Please Note
• Nr.14, July-August 1966, 16p unpag
  • S.E. Parker, Anarchism versus Socialism
  • Pat Parker, Dialogue with the Devil
  • Lyman Tower Sargent, Right Wing Individualism in the United States – 3: H.L. Hunt
  • Entre nous
  • Literature: Armand, Parker, Stirner
  • James L. Walker, Egoism and Justice (from: The Philosophy of Egoism)
  • Roger Tite, A Refutation of Individualist Anarchism (+ note by S.E.P.)
  • Jeff Robinson, Who’s for Psychology?
  • Letters: David Coull (+ note by S.E.P.)
• Nr.15, Sept-Oct 1966, 16p
  • S.E. Parker, MINUS ONE… (three years old)
  (Nr.1=6p, 70Aufl., Nr.15=16p, 300Aufl.)
  • “Cedric Fauntleroy”, Anarchists and Politics
  • Kerry Thornley, Letter from America: Two Communities in Latin America
  • Discussion of Jean-Pierre Schweitzer’s “O Idios” (Ellingham, Parker)
  • Lyman Tower Sargent, Right Wing Individualism in the United States – 4: Barry M. Goldwater and    William F. Buckley Jr
  • Letters: Peter Neville, Roger Tite
• Nr.16, Nov-Dec 1966, 16p
  • S.E. Parker, The Morality of Co-operation
  • Enzo Martucci, Individualist Amoralism (from the French “L’Unique”)
  • Jeff Robinson, Mary’s Question Answered
  • Stephen Marletta, Three Cheers for the Animals
  • Lyman Tower Sargent, Right Wing Individualism in the United States –
  •    5: Ayn Rand and Objectivism
  •    6: Conclusion
  • Letters: Francis Ellingham on J.P. Schweitzer’s “O Idios”
• Nr.17, Jan-Feb 1967, 14p
  • S.E. Parker, Some Slings and Arrows (re Roseman, A Way Out, Jul-Aug 1966)
  • Jim Duke, Total Freedom
  • Stephen Marletta, Enzo Martucci
  • Domenico Pastorello, The Morality of a Free Man
  • Herbert C. Roseman, Reflections of a Libertarian
  • Reviews: movie “Fahrenheit 451”, Jeff Robinsons “Anarchism…”
• Nr.18, May 1967, 14p
  • Pat Parker, Another Speakout
  • S.E. Parker, Another Appeal
  • Enzo Martucci, Manifesto of the Outsiders
  • S.E. Parker, A Comment (to Manifesto)
  • Alistair MacHenry, Notes and Reflections
  • Enzo Martucci, In Defence of Stirner (vs. Zoccoli & Serafini) – Part 1
  • E. Bertran, Notes on Individualism
  • Letters: Jeff Robinson, Geoffrey Boardman
• Nr.19, July 1967, 12p
  • S.E. Parker, Divorce, Duty and the Bishop
  • Letters: Murray N. Rothbard & answer by S.E.P., P.W. Goddard, Francis
  • Ellingham, Enzo Martucci
  • Enzo Martucci, In Defence of Stirner – Part 2
• Nr.20, Oct-Dec 1967, 18p
  • S.E. Parker, Enemies of Society: An Open Letter to the Editors of “Freedom”
  • Lyman Tower Sargent, Automation and Anarchism
  • Enzo Martucci, In Defence of Stirner – Part 3
  • Robert LeFevre, Morality versus Egoism
  • S.E. Parker, Reply
  • Letters: Domenico Pastorello, Alistair MacHenry, Robert Hallstead (+ note by S.E.P.)
• Nr.21, Feb 1968, 18p
  • Benjamin DeCasseres, Posterity: The New Superstition (from Liberty Nr.402)
  • Robert LeFevre, More on Morality versus Egoism
  • S.E. Parker: Reply
  • Enzo Martucci, Renzo Novatore [1889-1922]
  • Domenico Pastorello, The Libertarian of Tomorrow
  • S.E. Parker, Stirner on Education (review)
• Nr.22, June 1968, 12p
  • Enzo Martucci, Neither East Nor West!
  • S.E. Parker, A Thought of Season
  • Francis Ellingham, Reply to Parker’s “Enemies of Society”
  • S.E. Parker, In Defence of Social Pessimism
  • Letters: Lyman Tower Sargent, Tony Gibson
• Nr.23, Dec 1968, 12p
  • [S.E. Parker], Thoughts out of Season: Individualism, Anarchism and the Police (on Donald Rooum)
  • Mildred J. Loomis, More on the Green Revolution
  • E. Bertran, Walking on Air (Reply to A Way Out)
  • Jeff Robinson, Reply to Ellingham
  • Francis Ellingham, Reply
  • S.E. Parker, [On Ellingham-Robinson Controversy]
• Nr.24, July 1969, 10p
  • S.E. Parker, Thoughts out of Season (Case Aldo Braibanti)
  • Kerry Thornley, The Ego and His Definitions
  • Alain Roinet, Reflections on Violence
  • Enzo Martucci, Nietzsche
  • Donald Rooum, A Protest
  • S.E. Parker, A Retort
• Nr.25, Dec 1969, 12p
  • Jeff Robinson, Who’s for the Anthill?
  • Wm.J. Boyer, Notes on Thus Spoke Zarathustra
  • Benjamin Best, A Statement and Two Notes on Terminology (+ note by S.E.P.)
  • Gerald Muller, The True Face of Marxism
  • Enzo Martucci, In Praise of Chaos
  • Kurt Zube, Herr Helms and Herr Stirner
  • Renzo Ferrari [son of Renzo Novatore], Brief Statements
  • S.E. Parker, review of Lyman Tower Sargent: Contemporary Political Ideologies (especially on Sargent’s    presentation of Parker’s position)
  • On the death of Leon Rodriguez (i.e. E. Bertran), 92 years old
• Nr.26, Aug 1970, 10p
  • E. Armand, Individualist Perspectives
  • S.E. Parker, En Marge (on US-anarchist Stephen Halbrook)
  • Enzo Martucci, In Praise of Chaos (cont.)
  • W. Millis, The Road to Hell… To All Egoists, conscious or otherwise
  • Wm.J. Boyer, Notes on Thus Spoke Zarathustra (cont.)
• Nr.27, Feb 1971, 12p
  • James J. Martin, Who Wants to be “Free”? (1948)
  • S.E. Parker, En Marge (on Victor Serge, Albert Jay Nock, Woodcock & Hippies)
  • E. Armand, Value – The Consequences of its Abolition
  • S.E. Parker, Review of J.J.Martin: Men Against the State
  • Stephen Marletta, Review of Enzo Martucci: La Setta Rossa
  • Enzo Martucci, A Note on Authority
  • Letters: Benjamin Best, Steve Halbrook (+ reply S.E.P.)
• Nr.28, Aug 1971, 12p
  • George Bernard Shaw, Anarchism versus State Socialism (1889)
  • S.E. Parker, En Marge (on Jeff Robinson’s “The Unavoidable Crisis” & Paterson’s book & Carroll’s edition    & their reviews
  • William Flygare, Man Meets Book – Some Notes on Reading Stirner
  • E. Armand, Value – The Consequences of its Abolition (cont.)
  • J.F.C. Moore (Center for Libertarian Studies), Letter to the Editor
• Nr.29, Spring 1972, 14p
  • William Flygare, Man Meets Book (cont.)
  • Tom Lisicki, I now
  • Michael Muir, Iconomics – A Brief Introduction
  • W.F., Nietzsche and Everything
  • Francis Ellingham, Social Totalitarianism (review Baldelli)
  • S.E. Parker, Anarchism and Moralization
  • Letter: Jeff Robinson
• Nr.30, Autumn 1972 (belatedly dated), 18p
  • >>>subtitle changed as follows: <<<
  >>>AN IRREGULAR REVIEW FOR INDIVIDUALISTS, ANARCHISTS, AND EGOISTS<<<
  • S.E. Parker, En Marge (on Walker & Badcock, as accesses to individualist anarchism easier than Stirner)
  • Francis Ellingham, Against Anarchist Idealism
  • Letters: William Flygare, Mike Muir
  • William Flygare, Man Meets Book (cont.)
• Nr.31, Spring 1973, 14p
  • S.E. Parker, En Marge: More Attacks on St.Max (Holbrook-Humanist, Lindsay-Communist)
  • What do Individualists Want? A 1920 Manifesto
  • Daniel Giraud, Enzo Novatore – Outlaw Anarchist
  • Jeffrey Stewart, [Against Harry S. Truman]
  • Wm. Flygare, Tid Bits
  • “Egoist”, Review of Lysander Spooner’s “No Treason”
  • Leland Schubert, James L. Walker (repr. from New Libertarian Notes, Dec.1972, ed.by Sam Konkin III)
  • James L. Walker, Our Pleasure is our “Perfection” (from “The Phil. of Ego.”)
  • Domenico Pastorello, Tolerance
• Nr.32, 1973, 16p
  • S.E. Parker, En Marge: Quotations from Armand’s “The Future Society”
  • Chris R. Tame, Stirner in Context (Hegel, Genesis of Marx’s Hist.Mat.)
  • Letter: R.W.K. Paterson
  • Pat Parker, In Defence of Failure, In Praise of Dylan Thomas
  • S.E. Parker, Book Review: Riley on Mackay
  • W.F., Nostalgia and Neweralgia: About J.J.Martin’s “Revisionist Viewpoints”
• Nr.33, 1974, 10p
  • Dora Marsden, Selections from Her Writings on Egoism (by S.E.P.)
  • Pierre Jouventin, An Autopsy of the French Anarchist Movement
  • Domenico Pastorello, Some Last Words
  • Stephen Marletta, Review of Leonardo Bettini’s Bibliografia dell’anarchismo
• Nr.34, 1974, 12p
  • S.E. Parker, Malfew Seklew – The Jester Philosopher of Egoism
  • Francis Ellingham, Marx, Stirner, and “I”
  • S.E. Parker, Notes and Comments (Ellingham, “Le Feuille”, Carroll’s “Break-
  • Out From the Crystal Palace”)
  • J.K. Sowerby, Lateral Inversion: The Politics of “The Opposite”
  • Wm. Flygare, [On DeMatteis’s “very small step”]
  • D.S. Maure, The Image of a Free Man (Igualada, Mexico)
• Nr.35, 1975, 16p
  • Francis Ellingham, Stirner and the Universe
  • S.E. Parker, A Reply
  • Death of René Guillot
  • Malfew Seklew, [On Ramsay MacDonald, 1913]
  • S.E.P., The Devil a Plagiarist would be… (Ragnar Redbeard)
  • Mark A. Sullivan, Anarchist-Individualism then – The Prospects for Liberation now
  • Stephen Marletta, Review of Errico Arrigoni’s “Zuluito…”
  • S.E. Parker, Review of La Boetie’s “Will to Bondage” ed. Flygare
• Nr.36, 1975, 18p
  • Scepticus, Uniqueness and Finitude
  • James J. Martin, Laurance Labadie (died Aug 12, 1975)
  • Letter: Paul Rowlandson (to Sullivan’s Stirner in Nr.35)
  • Chris R. Tame, Review of “Leaving the Twentieth Century” (Situationists)
  • Brand, The Afflictions of the Critics of the Ego
  • Francis Ellingham, S.E. Parker and Sole Ego Stirner (reply to Parker,Nr.35)
  • S.E. Parker, And Another Reply (to Ellingham)
• Nr.37, 1976, 14p
  • S.E. Parker, Anarchism, Authority and Power (on Milgram’s experiment)
  • Scepticus, The Myth of Monism
  • Wm. Flygare, Stirneriana (on French and Italian translations of Stirner)
  • Robert E. Sagehorn, Notes on Parker and Ellingham and Stirner
  • Herbert C. Roseman, Another Note on Laurance Labadie
  • Wm. Flygare, A Note on my edition of The Will to Bondage
  • Stephen Marletta, Review of The Totalitarian Nightmare by Enrico Arrigoni
  • “Egoist”, Reviews (Flygare, Labadie, La Boetie)
• Nr.[38], [Feb] 1977, 12p
  • >>>Title and subtitle changed as follows:<<<
  >>>EGO. An Individualist Review (incorporating MINUS ONE), <<<
  • anonymous, Anarchism, Individualism and Max Stirner (on Clark’s book)
  • Francis Ellingham, Stirner and the Myth of Pluralism
  • Scepticus, A Reply to Ellingham
  • R.W.K. Paterson, “My book not based on a doctoral dissertation”
  • Nicolas Walter, Note on a Note (re: Flygare’s La Boetie)
  • Wm. Flygare, A Note on a Note on a Note
  • anonymous, The Story of an Egoist Objector
  • Renzo Ferrari & S.E. Parker, Enzo Martucci – The Tragic End
  • S.E.P., Domenico Pastorello (died 1976 at age 90)
  • Addendum to The Will of Bondage (La Boetie) re: Han Ryner
• Nr.39, [Aug] 1977, 6p
  >>>Title again as before Nr.38, no subtitle <<<
  • M.A.W., Anarchy and History – An Existentialist View
  • Scepticus, Alienation – Or Mystification?
  • Mark A. Sullivan, Comment on Ellingham and Scepticus
  • p.5: editor’s note: I AM NOT “SCEPTICUS” (see EGO Nr.2, p.7: G.Webster)
  • S.E. Parker, Reviews (containing some autobiographical notes)
• Nr.40, 1978, 8p
  • S.E. Parker, The Poet and the Bogeyman (Holbrook vs. Stirner)
  • Scepticus, Anarchism, Individualism an “Society” – Some Thoughts
  • Enzo da Villafiore (=Martucci), My Polemic With E. Armand (1925)
• Nr.41, 1978, 12p
  • Pierre Chardon, Individualism (=Maurice Charron, 1894-1919 >>>E.Armand)
  • Francis Ellingham, John Clark and Stirner’s Negativity
  • T[erry] Carlin, Ibsen’s Last Blow at Moralism (from Liberty, April 1897)
  • S.E. Parker, Review of Lysander Spooner’s “Vices are not Crimes” (incl. an attack on the “arch-   moralist Murray Rothbard”, author of an introduction
  • S.E.P., Review of “Inconvenient History” by James J. Martin
  • S.E.P., Review of Kropotkin’s “Anarchism” and Goodman’s “Black Flag…”
• Nr.42, 1979, 13p
  • Marilisa Fiorina, Freedom and Solitude
  • Pastor H. Noel Rettig, Stirner’s Usefulness for Theology
  • E. Armand, The Influence of Tucker’s Ideas in France
  • Meanda, Two Movies: All That Heaven Allows & Stevie
  • Veronica Vaccaro, about “Individualistischer Anarchismus” (Libertad)
  • S.E. Parker, Review of Paul Avrich’s “Voltairine de Cleyre”
  • S.E.P., Reviews of Solneman (“Der Einzige”), Flygare
  • Veronica Vaccaro, Hem Day (1902-1969)
  • Lawrence Stepelevich, Note (on his coming book)
• Nr.43, 1980, 10p
  • >>>again the following subtitle: An Individualist Review <<<
  • S.E. Parker, Individualism and the Freedom Association
  • E. Bertran, “A la Bastille” – An Individualist Looks at the Fr.Revol.(1930)
  • Francis Ellingham, Review of “L’Homme Libre”, (French individualist journal)
  • S.E.P., Reviews (Dettmeijer, Philosophical Forum: Left Hegelians)
  • S.E.P., Review: Selected Essay by Laurance Labadie
• Nr.44, 1980, 11p
  • S.E. Parker, Stirner, Marx and Fascism (on Kolakowski’s book on Marxism)
  • C.J. Bjorklund, Individualist Anarchism and the Swedish Anarchists (1966)
  • S.E.P., Editorial Comment
  • Wm. Flygare, A Much Belated Review (Bernd Kast)
  • S.E.P., Anarchism in Japan
• Nr.1, 1982, 7p
  • >>>new title: EGO (Incorporating Minus One) <<<
  >>>subtitle remains: An Individualist Review <<<
  • Max Stirner, Art and Religion, translated by Lawrence S. Stepelevich
• Nr.2, 1982, 8p
  • S.E. Parker, Nietzsche – Antichrist?
  • S.E.P., New Publications (Stirner’s “Ego…”, Watner, Arrigoni)
  • Veronica Vaccaro, Charles-Auguste Bontemps and Social Individualism
  • S.E.P., Editorial Comment
  • Benjamin DeCasseres, The Individualist (excerpt, 1936)
• Nr.3, 1983, 8p
  • Antony Milne, Is a Freethinker Really an Individualist?
  • S.E. Parker, Review of Solneman’s “Manifesto…”
  • Stephen Marletta, Review of Mackay’s “Freedomseeker”
• Nr.4, 1984, 12p
  • >>>new size: A5 <<<
  >>>no subtitle <<<
  • S.E. Parker, Ego and Society
  • James L. Walker, What is Justice? (Liberty, 6 March 1886)
  • Antony Milne, The Egoist Salutes Orwell
  • Publications: J.J.Martin, Beyond Pearl Harbour & Mackay Society, The Storm
  • Dora Marsden, Freedom
• Nr.5, 1984, 12p
  • anonym [S.E.P.], On Revisiting “Saint Max” (Ferguson)
  • Henry Rosenblum, Letter (Critique of Walker)
  • S.E.P., Reply (Defence of Walker)
  • S.E.P., New Book by J.J.Martin: The Man Who Invented “Genocide” (Hist.Rev.)
  • Antony Milne, Review of “The Failure of Faith” by Muir Weissinger
  • Oscar Levy, A Letter (Nov 16, 1933)
  • “Egoist”, Comment
• Nr.6, 1985, 12p
  • Tom Lisicki, I Now
  • Keith Hudson, Individualism and Social Ties (Extract from a letter)
  • Stephen Marletta, Review of “Might is Right” by Ragnar Redbeard (1896)
  •    (Intro by S.E. Parker: Redbeard is a moralist)
  • S.E. Parker, Review of book by J.J.Martin (see Nr.5)
  • S.E. Parker, Review of “The Leap” by Bill Hopkins, foreword Colin Wilson
  • Dora Marsden, Liberty, [Law] and Democracy (1914, excerpt)
• Nr.7, 1986, 12p
  • S.E. Parker, The Egoism of Max Stirner (extracts from a coming book, on Camus, Fleischmann,    Lachmann, Stourzh)
  • Antony Milne, Sociology and the Death of the Ego
  • Leighton Pagan (=John Badcock Jr), Views of a 19th Century Egoist (1898)
  • John Gillard, On Being Self Centred
  • S.E. Parker, Review of Donald Rooum’s “Wildcat” cartoons
• Nr.8, 1986, 12p
  >>>Title changed: THE EGOIST (formerly EGO) <<<
  • S.E. Parker, Archists, Anarchists and Egoists
  • Letters: Francis Ellingham, Mark Sullivan, Donald Rooum
  • S.E. Parker, Notes and Notions (on 100 years “Freedom”)
• Nr.9, 1987, 12p
  • Controversy: More on Archists, Anarchists and Egoists
  • Fritz R. Ward, Comments
  • S.E. Parker, Reply
  • Alan Koontz, The Difference Between Archism and Egoism
  • S.E. Parker, Reply
  • Alan Koontz, The Cost of Running Amok Within and Without the State
  • Stephen Marletta, Review: “Benjamin Tucker & the Champions of Liberty”
  • “Egoist”, Review: Robert Anton Wilson, Natural Law or…”
  • Letter by J.Gillard
• Nr.10, 1988, 12p
  • S.E. Parker, Race and Ego (on Richard Swartzbaugh’s “Utopia of Instincts”, and Margaret Knight’s    “Morals Without Religion” a.o.)
  • Max Stirner, Reply to his Critics (extracts)
  • Pia Baroja, Individuality (1919)
• Nr.11, 1989, 12p
  • Frank Jordan, Marx versus Stirner – Towards a Critique of German Ideology
  • S.E. Parker, A “Reactionary” Utopia (book review)
  • Letters: by Richard Swartzbaugh, by Adeline Champney
  • Francis Ellingham, Reply to Gillard (Nr.9)
  • John Gillard, Comment
  • S.E.P., Stephen Marletta died (1907-1989)
  • S.E. Parker, Notes and Notions (a.o. on The Scorpion, “Neo-Nazi”)
• Nr.12, 1990, 12p
  • Wm.J. Boyer, Notes on Thus Spoke Zarathustra
  • S.E. Parker, Two Egoists: William J. Boyer and Stephen Marletta
  • A Brief History of the Defence of Western Civilization in Vietnam
  • Stephen Marletta, The “I”
• Nr.13, 1991, 8p
  >>>new title: EGO (incorporating THE EGOIST) <<<
  • S.E. Parker, The Myth of Morality (lecture 1990)
  • James L. Walker, Von Hartmann and Stirner (from his intro to Stirner)
  • Giovanni Papini, [anarchistic ideal self-contradictory]
• Nr.14, 1991, 8p
  • S.E. Parker, Notes on Stirner and Nietzsche
  • Stirner on Nietzsche? (from J.N.Figgis’s “The Will to Freedom”, 1917)
  • Herbert Stourzh, Stirner and Nietzsche (extracts)
  • Letter: Michael Muir-Harmony on Papini (Nr.13)
• Nr.15, 1993, 8p
  • Dora Marsden, Thinking and Thought (1913)
  • S.E. Parker, 1963-1993 (thirty years, Minus One to Ego)
  • (Parker’s first editorial, and his comment 1993) ftp://solan:@tenshian.pair.com//usr/home/solan/public_html/nonserv/egoistarchive/commentaries/parker_index.html